Valtteri Bottas became the third different polesitter of the 2019 season as Mercedes locked out the front row in Shanghai. We take a look at all the stats and stories from Saturday at the Chinese Grand Prix!
Q U A L I F Y I N G R E C A P
- Bottas takes pole by 0.023s from Hamilton
- Albon fails to participate in qualifying after heavy crash in FP3
- Renault reach Q3 for first time in 2019, as does Gasly
- Both McLarens eliminated in Q2
- Raikkonen misses out on Q3 for the first time since Hungary 2016
The Ultimate Pace
FASTEST SECTOR 1 |
FASTEST SECTOR 2 |
FASTEST SECTOR 3 |
23.921 Lewis Hamilton |
27.016 Lewis Hamilton |
40.240 Lewis Hamilton |
While Valtteri Bottas took pole position, it was his Mercedes team-mate Lewis Hamilton who set today’s ultimate pace, with the fastest time in all three sectors. Had he hooked the three sectors together on his final push for pole, Hamilton would have set a lap time over three tenths faster than Bottas’ actual pole lap. Given the high tyre degradation experienced at the Shanghai International Circuit, finding a balance between being fast in all three sectors and saving the tyres is difficult – hence why the gap between the best actual lap time and the best potential lap time is higher than usual.
POLE LAP |
ULTIMATE PACE |
1:31.547 |
1:31.177 |
By adding each drivers’ best three sector times together, we can get an idea of who put a lap together when it mattered, and who failed to pull all three sectors into one fast lap. Romain Grosjean was the only driver who set all of their three fastest sector times on their final lap in qualifying, while Lewis Hamilton was the furthest away from his ultimate pace – 0.393 seconds. The lap times are compared in the table below:
Pos | Driver | Qualifying Time | Ultimate Pace | Difference | Ultimate Pace Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Valtteri Bottas | 91.547 | 91.422 | -0.125 | 2 |
2 | Lewis Hamilton | 91.570 | 91.177 | -0.393 | 1 |
3 | Sebastian Vettel | 91.848 | 91.506 | -0.342 | 3 |
4 | Charles Leclerc | 91.865 | 91.642 | -0.223 | 4 |
5 | Max Verstappen | 92.089 | 91.853 | -0.236 | 5 |
6 | Pierre Gasly | 92.930 | 92.804 | -0.126 | 7 |
7 | Daniel Ricciardo | 92.958 | 92.912 | -0.046 | 8 |
8 | Nico Hulkenberg | 92.962 | 92.679 | -0.283 | 6 |
9 | Kevin Magnussen | 93.150 | 92.947 | -0.203 | 9 |
10 | Romain Grosjean | 93.156 | 93.156 | 0.000 | 11 |
11 | Daniil Kvyat | 93.236 | 92.970 | -0.266 | 10 |
12 | Sergio Perez | 93.299 | 93.244 | -0.055 | 13 |
13 | Kimi Raikkonen | 93.419 | 93.331 | -0.088 | 14 |
14 | Carlos Sainz | 93.523 | 93.217 | -0.306 | 12 |
15 | Lando Norris | 93.967 | 93.847 | -0.120 | 15 |
16 | Lance Stroll | 94.292 | 94.081 | -0.211 | 16 |
17 | George Russell | 95.253 | 95.077 | -0.176 | 17 |
18 | Robert Kubica | 95.281 | 95.213 | -0.068 | 18 |
19 | Antonio Giovinazzi | ||||
20 | Alexander Albon |
The team-mate battles
Qualifying for the Chinese Grand Prix saw some close lap times between team-mates – particularly between the Mercedes, Ferrari, Renault and Haas pairings. Just 0.004 seconds separated Daniel Ricciardo and Nico Hulkenberg in the final part of qualifying and, while the Haas pair didn’t set a lap time in Q3, Kevin Magnussen was just 0.006 seconds faster than Romain Grosjean in Q2.
Largest gaps in each session:
Q1: Charles Leclerc 0.845s faster than Sebastian Vettel
Q2: Max Verstappen 0.579s faster than Pierre Gasly
Q3: Max Verstappen 0.841s faster than Pierre Gasly
Gap between team-mates in last session where each driver set a time:
As neither Antonio Giovinazzi nor Alexander Albon set a competitive time in qualifying, their results have been omitted from the table below.
Team |
Gap |
Winner |
Mercedes |
0.023 |
Bottas |
Ferrari |
0.017 |
Vettel |
Red Bull |
0.841 |
Verstappen |
Renault |
0.004 |
Ricciardo |
Haas |
0.006 |
Magnussen |
McLaren |
0.444 |
Sainz |
Racing Point |
0.266 |
Perez |
Williams |
0.028 |
Russell |
Looking at each driver’s ultimate pace also offers an interesting glimpse into who was fastest in each sector in each team. The results can be found in the table below. The smallest gap between team-mates’ best sector times was at Ferrari, where Charles Leclerc was only 0.002 seconds faster than Sebastian Vettel in the middle sector. Meanwhile, with their best three sector times combined, Max Verstappen’s best potential lap was 0.951 seconds faster Pierre Gasly’s.
Driver |
FASTEST SECTOR 1 |
FASTEST SECTOR 2 |
FASTEST SECTOR 3 |
FASTEST OVERALL |
Mercedes |
HAMILTON |
HAMILTON |
HAMILTON |
HAMILTON |
Ferrari |
VETTEL |
LECLERC |
VETTEL |
VETTEL |
Red Bull |
VERSTAPPEN |
VERSTAPPEN |
VERSTAPPEN |
VERSTAPPEN |
Renault |
RICCIARDO |
HULKENBERG |
HULKENBERG |
HULKENBERG |
Haas |
GROSJEAN |
MAGNISSEN |
MAGNUSSEN |
MAGNUSSEN |
McLaren |
SAINZ |
SAINZ |
SAINZ |
SAINZ |
Racing Point |
PEREZ |
PEREZ |
PEREZ |
PEREZ |
Williams |
RUSSELL |
KUBICA |
RUSSELL |
RUSSELL |
Find all the team-mate battle statistics for the 2019 season here!
Team Pace
As noted above, Mercedes had the quickest car in all three sectors, while Ferrari were second fastest in all three. After being beaten by Haas on pace in Bahrain, Red Bull returned to their expected form, with the third quickest car in every sector. It was a shame for Alex Albon to miss out on qualifying – Toro Rosso had the fifth fastest car in both the first and last sectors, meaning they had a good chance of qualifying in the top ten, as demonstrated by Daniil Kvyat missing out on Q3 by just 0.022 seconds.
GAP TO ULTIMATE PACE |
GAP TO POLE |
|
Mercedes |
0 |
-0.37 |
Ferrari |
0.327 |
-0.043 |
Red Bull |
0.676 |
0.306 |
Renault |
1.487 |
1.117 |
Haas |
1.668 |
1.298 |
Toro Rosso |
1.793 |
1.423 |
McLaren |
2.04 |
1.67 |
Racing Point |
2.067 |
1.697 |
Alfa Romeo |
2.154 |
1.784 |
Williams |
3.877 |
3.507 |
About the above table: the ‘gap to ultimate pace’ column shows the gap between the team’s best three sector times added together and the overall best three sector times added together. The ‘gap to pole time’ column shows the gap between the team’s best three sector times added together and the lap time of the polesitter.
Improvements between 2018 and 2019
The table below shows the difference in each team’s best potential lap time in qualifying for the Chinese Grand Prix between 2018 and 2019. Racing Point were the most improved team, with their best 2019 lap being over nine tenths faster than their best 2018 effort.
Team | 2018 | 2019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Racing Point | 94.288 | 93.331 | -0.957 |
Alfa Romeo | 93.616 | 92.97 | -0.646 |
Mercedes | 91.479 | 91.177 | -0.302 |
Red Bull | 91.731 | 91.853 | +0.122 |
Toro Rosso | 93.049 | 93.217 | +0.168 |
Haas | 92.498 | 92.845 | +0.347 |
Renault | 92.313 | 92.664 | +0.351 |
Ferrari | 91.044 | 91.504 | +0.460 |
McLaren | 92.740 | 93.244 | +0.504 |
Williams | 94.050 | 95.054 | +1.004 |
All set for Sunday:
Can Valtteri Bottas convert his pole position into a win to take a second win of the season? Will Ferrari be able to challenge Mercedes in the Grand Prix, or will Red Bull be a bigger threat from behind? Will Kimi Raikkonen be able to maintain his points-scoring form, despite starting from thirteenth? There are plenty of questions to be answered in tomorrow’s 1000th World Championship race!
In the Lucky and Unlucky Grid Positions:
[one_half]
LUCKY:
3rd: Sebastian Vettel
5th: Max Verstappen
6th: Pierre Gasly
8th: Nico Hulkenberg
11th: Daniil Kyat
12th: Sergio Perez[/one_half]
[one_half_last]
UNLUCKY:
4th: Charles Leclerc
13th: Kimi Raikkonen
15th: Lando Norris
20th: Alexander Albon[/one_half_last]
Find out what makes each grid position lucky or unlucky here!